Peter Foster, a columnist for a Canadian newspaper, the National Post, caught my attention with a article reviewing the recent World Economic Forum
held in Davos, Switzerland. The WEF is a Swiss NPO looking to inculcate Corporate Responsibility into business practices around the world. Their motto is ‘entrepreneurship in the global public interest’.
Mr Foster begins his article
by stating “The typically pretentious theme of this year’s World Economic Forum in Davos is “Shaping the Post-Crisis World.” But didn’t Davos shape the pre-crisis world, and thus the crisis itself? The annual Alpine gabfest has long been the epicentre of ‘globaloney,’ a mixture of serious discussion, subversive ideas and outright flakery.”
While he has an obviously negative view of the WEF, it was his following comment that proved far more troubling to me - “In fact, Davos Man has his fingerprints all over the present crisis. Subprime loans were the very model of corporate social responsibility, of putting communities and people before profits.”
While I may not disagree with everything in Fosters shrill toned sarcastic article, I must take exception to the above quote. My exception is not based on a difference of opinion, but rather on poor journalism, and an columnists titillating reach exceeding his informed grasp.
Corporate Social Responsibility had little, if anything to do with the sub-prime crises.
Here is a brief primer for Foster’s readers, so they are not poisoned against good thinking by irresponsible comments made for effect.
“Prior to the first decade of the 21st century, it was customary for a U.S. bank to exercise due diligence (an investigation into the applicant's history) when considering lending money for a mortgage. Banks wanted to know all about an applicant's financial stability -- income, debt, credit rating -- and they wanted it verified. This changed after the mortgage-backed security (MBS) was introduced.
Eventually, the most desirable, qualified customers dried up; they all had homes. So banks turned to customers they'd traditionally shunned -- subprime borrowers. These are borrowers with low credit ratings who pose a high risk of defaulting on their loan. But lenders of all stripes bent over backwards in the early 2000s to get this type of borrower into homes. The no-document loan was created, a type of loan for which the lender didn't ask for any information and the borrower didn't offer it. People who may have been unemployed as far as the lender knew received loans for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Why?
One answer is that, with the introduction of MBSs, lenders no longer assumed the risk of a loan default. They simply issued the loan and promptly sold it to others who ultimately took the risk if payments stopped. And since MBSs created early on were based on mortgages granted to the more dependable prime borrowers, the securities performed well. They performed so well that investors clamored for more. In response, lenders loosened their restrictions for mortgage applicants and borrowed heavily to create cash flow for loans in order to create more mortgages. Without mortgages, after all, there are no mortgage-backed securities.”
I highly recommend a read through of Josh Clark’s entire article
. Or, you can get their Stuff You Should Know podcast, and listen to it on the way to work.
A foundational tenant for CSR is sustainability.
Obviously, responding to a market driven demand by concocting an inferior product that would eventually hurt both homeowners and the uninformed investors of mortgage-backed securities is ludicrous.
All that to say, the financial crises is about the best example of why CSR will be the norm for business in the near future. I won’t disagree with the ‘flake’ factor in many of these discussions and organizations, but there are serious people doing serious work in this field. Oh, and by the way - the UN itself is ‘an impossible dream’. We have it so that we are not left with only dreams of easily achieved mediocrity.