45% of those who took our website poll felt that donors fund NGOs based on popularity. 33% opined it is based on track record.

Do you find it surprising? Is the finidng in sync with your experience?

If this is the general trend, should NGOs be spending much more on communication than what they are currently allocating?

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What did the poll ask? And how did you define 'popularity'?

NGOs ought to be as concerned with performance and transparency ('track record') as they should with brand ('popularity') - ultimately, you can't just do one or the other well...

Reply to This

It was a simple poll..Question was "How do donors select the NGOs they fund"

Popularity is the brand popularity. Agreed that performance and transparency is important. Somehow not equal importance is paid to building of brands.In many cases there just isn't enough funds. In which case NGO chooses to invest it in work rather than building of a brand.

Reply to This

RSS

Latest Activity

Hello Surya, Thank you for your response. I am afraid, I am not the Ipsita Basu from Surat. I appreciate your optimism, but the point is to mainstream good ideas into sustainable livelihood outcomes at the macro level. Somehow we seem to be obsessed…
5 minutes ago
Carys Hughes added a discussion
Innovation Flash, Issue 7 - August 2010 Should we keep on calling insurance at the bottom of the pyramid "microinsurance?" That is the question Peter Wrede from AKAM proposes to discuss in the editorial. The Newsletter highlights the Facility's new…
6 hours ago
Aline Kambayi updated their profile
9 hours ago
Greetings to Standards organizations around the World: Please review this 3 minute film to more fully understand our purpose in contacting you. An imagined discussion between Robert Steele of the ISO Group and Georg Kell of The United Nations Glob…
10 hours ago

© 2007 Created by Development Crossing

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service